The 7-9 Seahawks are the NFCs Fourth Seed the playoffs that begin next week. They will host a game against the 11-5 Saints.
NFL playoff seeding format under scrutiny again, thanks to Seahawks
by Don Banks
> How much should a team be rewarded for a
> division championship in a weak division?
How about the reverse question...
Why should teams in tough divisions get penalized?
There are always one or two divisions in the league that are flat-out better than the rest. In years past the Jets and Patriots have made the AFC East a challenging division. The Giants, Eagles, and Cowboys have a tendency to create stiff competition in the NFC East.
- This year half of the Giants six loses came within their own division, and they aren't a playoff team.
- The Giants were 7-3 against the rest of the league.
- As opposed to the playoff Seahawks, who went 3-7 when playing out-of-division games.
- The #2 seeded Bears are only 6-4 outside of their own division.
I'd suggest the following two rules:
1. No team with a losing record inside their division should ever be allowed to play in the playoffs. In other words, you can't lose 4 games in your division and finish 12-4 and make the playoffs, but winning 3 games in your division and finishing 13-3 would be good enough to get you into the playoffs.
2. No team with a losing record out of their division should ever be allowed to play in the playoffs. In other words, you can't win 6 division games and finish 10-6 and make the playoffs, teams should be forced to put up at least 5 out-of-division wins to be playoff bound.
This would make a record of 3-3 in-division and 5-5 out-of-division the bare-minimum for playoff teams. This would ensure that another 7-9 team will never again make the playoffs.
Also, continue to give the Byes to the two best division winners, but reshuffle the remaining four playoff teams.