WebRoot | Imageless | Home | Journal | Longball | Wiki | Contact
A page for art, creativity, and robotics.

WebRoot
Imageless
Homepage
Journal
Longball
Wiki
Wedding

Contact
Valid XHTML 1.0!
Recent Posts
"Strategy Chess" game idea

New Bike

Humble

Christmas

Midnight

Creating Posterity

October Snow

Imageless Update

Education

Fall


Archives September 2007
October 2007
November 2007
December 2007
January 2008
February 2008
March 2008
April 2008
May 2008
June 2008
July 2008
August 2008
September 2008
October 2008
November 2008
December 2008
January 2009
February 2009
March 2009
April 2009
May 2009
June 2009
July 2009
August 2009
September 2009
October 2009
November 2009
December 2009
January 2010
February 2010
March 2010
April 2010
May 2010
June 2010
July 2010
August 2010
September 2010
October 2010
November 2010
December 2010
January 2011
February 2011
March 2011
April 2011
May 2011
June 2011
July 2011
August 2011
September 2011
October 2011
November 2011
December 2011
January 2012
Current Posts

Subscribe to
Posts [Atom]


Twitter Subscribe via Email RSS feed
Enter your e-mail
if you'd like to be
notified as new
posts are added:

Blogger


Tuesday, June 29, 2010

Exuberance


Wiktionary defines "exuberance" as "cheerful or vigorous enthusiasm". It's this latter definition that I'd like to think about a little bit more. Vigorous means physically strong or active while enthusiasm entails intensity of feeling.

Thus, exuberance is a "physically strong and intense feeling". This definition is awesome by itself, but it yearns to be paired with a different modifier. A certain Federal Reserve Bank Chairperson of the Board choose the word "Irrational" to accompany his "Exuberance".

For myself I choose the word "Youthful" as the preferred modifier for the word in question, thus "a physically strong and intense feeling of being young". Thus... "Youthful Exuberance". And fuck all y'all who don't agree.


Sunday, June 27, 2010

Off the Grid


I'm going to try something new for the next year or two. We ditched Co*cast two weeks ago and signed up for RCN Broadband Internet (Hooray for 10Mbps download speeds) for about $24.99/month. There's absolutely no free/cheap option for cable television available from RCN, so we decided to "Rabbit Ears" it.

Last time I had to use an antenna to get television reception was while I was living in Cambridge *before* I was dating Jen. Also, this was while I wasn't even subscribed to any Internet provider (so it was truly like living in the dark ages). As you may or may not know, during the last two years the government has regulated the Over-the-Air television industry to only broadcast "digital" signals. This was done because so-called "analog" signals waste huge amounts of the broadcast frequency spectrum, so ultimately it's a good thing that the country has upgraded.

Unfortunately, I don't have a "digital" television. Saturday morning I went to Best Buy to get a "digital" antenna. I got home and tried to set it up and learned that printing "digital" on the box doesn't mean anything. Eventually, I figured out that I had bought a second UHF/VHF antenna (meaning that there was a good possibility that I'd be able to return what I had just bought (thank goodness, because I had paid $70 for it)). I did some very brief Internet research and made the determination that all I needed was a digital tuner (i.e. Digital to Analog converter).

Long story short, Best Buy has three different types of these converters on their website, but they don't seem to carry them in their store. We tried the local Radio Shack, but they had "just sold their last one to somebody else". I assume that other people in the area are also engaging in a mass-exodus from the evil Co*cast Corporation. Eventually we dropped by the Radio Shack in Central Square where we were able to buy the converter we needed for about $60.

We set it up with my old set of rabbit ears (glad I held onto that after moving out of the Cambridge apartment) and everything works GREAT. All the normal channels comes in really nicely. It appears as though broadcasting digital signals has the added bonus of not having to point the antenna in a different direction in order to watch Fox or ABC (which is greatly appreciated). I was also successful in my quest to return my extra antenna back to Best Buy this morning, so bonus for not needing to spend that money. =)

In a semi-related note... I'm ready to return the Cable Modem that RCN has been renting to us for the past two weeks since I finally got around to giving them a call to get the Cable Modem that I own setup within their system. I do enjoy being able to save $5/month because I own the equipment that they would otherwise rent to me.


Saturday, June 26, 2010

World Cup


The World Cup is finally over for the US. We're the second team to be eliminated during the Round of Sixteen (the first was South Korea). I guess this means we finished in Fifteenth place, which is comparable to our Fourteenth place global ranking going into the competition.

I must say, the media needs to figure out how to blackout these games so that people in each home country can gather to watch the games during prime time. To hell with "Live" coverage of a sports match occurring halfway around the world. Force our country to wait until it's 7pm local time before any information about the game can be broadcast. In lots of ways, I blame the Internet for this for making information so easy to access.

For what it's worth, though, I've enjoyed being able to semi-cheer for the US Team without being able to watch a single minute of competition on television due to being at work or otherwise being busy and incapable of accessing a television during the matches.

Oh well... maybe they'll do better in four years during the 2014 Brazil World Cup which will at least be in a near-local time zone so odd times like 10am games are unlikely to become an issue.


Wednesday, June 16, 2010

Design Flaw


Many document editors (from Microsoft Word to GNU Emacs) create "Scratchpad" copies of files as a way to enable a software feature which automatically saves your changes periodically to make a recovery possible in the event that something happens that causes the document editor to crash. My complaint today is about sticking these "Scratchpad" copies in the same directory where the originals are being stored.

When I'm forced to endure using a Windows-machine, I use the "Desktop" as a repository for all non-revision controlled work. This typically includes various "throwaway spreadsheets" and other types of work products that don't have a rightful place in any revision control repository. Thus, what happens is anytime I edit these Microsoft Office documents from my Desktop it *consumes* an additional location by creating its "Scratchpad" Tilda-Buck file (i.e. ~$Filename.docx). I don't want it to keep this file on my Desktop.

The same thing applies on Linux, though. For example, I use VIM (Vi IMproved 5.6) to edit test scripts at work and it creates Dot-Swap files (i.e. .Filename.sh.swp) for each file I open.

Would it be so hard to have a "Scratchpad" directory to relegate these temporary working copies into? I understand that logic would need to be added for when I open "SRS.docx" from an e-mail while I've got a copy of "SRS.docx" open from my Desktop. My thought is that software engineers are capable of handling this and thinking of all the other use cases where related issues may occur. But my overall point is that my end user experience would be improved by not storing "Scratchpad" copies into the same directory as the original file.


Tuesday, June 15, 2010

Healthy Caring


Shawn Tully (shawn_tully@fortune.com) has authored a terribly-biased article for Fortune Magazine entitled 5 painful health-care lessons from Massachusetts.

Shawn begins by saying, "The Massachusetts plan does not control costs". Shawn's analysis takes it as a foregone conclusion that the answer is "No". The reality is that by making health care easier to get in Massachusetts people are more likely to seek treatment when symptoms first appear rather than waiting until pain becomes unbearable. As the saying goes, an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure. I would suspect that any spikes in program costs come from people who newly gained the ability to treat their chronic issues. I also surmise that Shawn would believe that dying an early, painful death while on an extremely expensive life-support machine is preferable to extending life through early treatment of unhealthy conditions. Obviously the former option is cheaper in the short-term.

Shawn then argues, "Community rating, guaranteed issue and mandated benefits swell costs." What he's saying is that "healthy" participants will choose NOT to sign-up for coverage until they actually need an operation. Shawn goes on to say that since the new state health care plan has gone into effect, 75% of the previously uninsured have signed up for service. My feeling is that his statistics are enough to disprove his point here. However, assuming that the remaining 25% are "gaming the system", I'd like to point out that these people have lots of risk of sudden, unexpected conditions developing. If somebody wants to *choose* to live a life where they'll risk paying out of pocket for the costs of a broken leg, then power to them. I'd prefer to live in a world where people can get affordable health insurance by paying a few hundred dollars per month so that those unexpected things in life end up being much closer to "free" to handle.

Shawn points out, "Huge subsidies for low-to-medium earners could prove extremely expensive." The only thing I have to say to this argument is that medium-to-high earners ought to be subsidizing the less fortune in a civialized society. Clearly, Shawn would probably be happier living in an uncivilized caveman era.

Shawn's fourth observation is that, "The exchanges reward people for working less and earning less." Yes, earning $28k and keeping all leads to an overall lower marginal rate of costs than earning $40k and giving away $3k of that for compulsory payments. However, living on $28k is certainly not better than living on $37k. Give me a break. Shawn seems to be out of touch with the trouble that lower income people have prioritizing where they should be spending their money month-to-month.

Shawn concludes, "The generous plans and added mandates give employers an incentive to drop health insurance." I'm not sure what he's thinking. I'm well aware that my employer pays 90% of my health insurance each month and that would be heavily factored in if I ever wanted to jump ship and go work somewhere else. All else being equal, I'd require a pretty large salary bump in order to jump ship into a company that doesn't offer health insurance, and I'd immediately begin looking to find a new job if my employer decided to stop offering this benefit. No, the argument that companies will drop health insurance benefits to save a buck doesn't resonate with reality, unless driving out your most talented employees is a new business strategy that I'm unaware of which is sweeping its way throughout MBA programs throughout the country. The saying goes that people are a companies most valuable asset. I dare any company to defy that saying and tell their employees that their health is NOT important by dropping their health care plans. It wouldn't be a mass-exodus, but over the years the company will eventually start a precipitous decline.

In conclusion, biased one-sided ways of looking at health care as a broken industry are not productive to the overall conversation of what is better, or worse for society.


Monday, June 14, 2010

This Week


This past weekend was pretty tame. Did a little shopping and had dinner at a friend's place. Today (Monday) I went to the dentist and then canceled Co*cast in favor of their competitor. Tuesday is Softball. Wednesday is Poker. Thursday is Golf. Then Saturday, Jen and I are going down the the Cape for two nights. Good times.

In the meantime, I've been putting some serious thought towards making Longball a reality. I'm recruiting anybody interested supporting this effort since it's undoubtedly going to be a big effort. Any assistance would be vastly appreciated. Let me know if you're interested.


Wednesday, June 9, 2010

Commuting


I got to work and back today on 0.000 gallons of gasoline using only pedal power. All told, I rode about twenty miles including ten in the light rain on the way home. Riding along the Charles River was awesome, but we already knew that. I must say that the rain was not that bad, but worrying about my cell phone getting soaked wasn't fun. Halfway through the day I had even mentioned to Jen that a water-proof bag would be clutch for situations like these. Though, a bag that stays put behind my back would also be nice. What I've got now is a messenger bag which is actually a lot better than my backpack because that one isn't big enough for work clothes and shower stuff. Oh yeah, I showered at work this morning. That kind of kicks ass.

My thought is that there's a good chance of my car getting partially repossessed in a month or two, so getting acclimated to not having one would be beneficial to me. I guess it's not for certain, but eventually Jen's going to get a job and I don't think it's likely that it'll be convenient to keep carpooling with her. There's always a chance that we'll get a second car, but a water-proof backpack large enough to fit my work clothes and my shower stuff is so much more healthy and affordable. Ya know?


Monday, June 7, 2010

Local Economy


My town is pushing an Economy Development agenda. There's even a Facebook page that you can "Like". The following video has a runtime of about 100 minutes, and comes from a May 24, 2010 meeting held in Town Hall. I hope syndicating it will give somebody who won't have otherwise seen it a chance to watch it.


Watertown Community Access Television


Thursday, June 3, 2010

Cyrenaicism


My Facebook profile lists my religion as Cyrenaicism. The Cyrenaics were an ultra-hedonist school of philosophy founded in the 4th century BCE, by Aristippus of Cyrene. They held that pleasure was the supreme good, especially immediate gratifications. The school was replaced within a century by the more moderate doctrine of Epicureanism, who held beliefs that longer-term pleasures were more valuable than instant gratification.

Epicureanism is cool, too. They have the Riddle of Epicurus which seeks to prove that a supreme deity either doesn't exist, or (if It does) isn't anything special. The riddle follows:

  1. God either wants to eliminate bad things and cannot,
  2. can but does not want to,
  3. neither wishes to nor can,
  4. both wants to and can.
If It wants to and cannot (1), then It is weak - and this does not apply to god. If It can but does not want to (2), then It is spiteful - which is equally foreign to god's nature. If It neither wants to nor can (3), It is both weak and spiteful, and so not a god. If It wants to and can (4), which is the only thing fitting for a god, where then do bad things come from? Or why does he not eliminate them?

This leads me to ponder whether "God" is nothing more than a technologically advanced society in some far off section of the galaxy who built a huge spaceship to that could fly to Earth and then seed life here. I know we have demonstrated life could have began spontaneously in the oceans as single-celled organisms, but I don't completely buy that this is how life started a billion years ago.

Anyway, one of the points of this post was to say that the listing in my Facebook profile is just kind of a joke. I don't really believe in the pursuit of pure pleasure being the tantamount purpose of life.