Motivation
It occurs to me that the number of people motivated to work hard is inversely proportional to the quality of life for the poorest portion of a population (I'm an alliteration dynamo).
Said another way, if the poor ever regularly got fanned with palm leaves and fed juicy grapes by robotic servants the entire population would have extremely low motivation. However, if being poor meant you'd be thrown into a lion's den for sport and the entertainment of others, the entire population would have a much higher intrinsic motivation to accomplish things to ensure they never became impoverished.
It's with this observation that I ask whether the stereotypical American "Social Safety Net" for impoverished individuals is a good or bad thing. I'm of the opinion that the government should guarantee a minimum quality of life of (a) 150 sq ft of temperature controlled housing, (b) three square meals per day, (c) access to free information/education, and (d) contemporary communication options including a voice cell phone and an e-mail address.
That being said, I think there are rights currently afforded to impoverished individuals that ought to be taken away. It seems to me like poor people get to raise children and I see this as a danger to society because it disenfranchises the children. Right now, it seems like the only way to lose your children is to actively abuse or neglect them. I think this might be due in part to the fact that (a) nobody wants to adopt older children who are "damaged goods" and (b) there's no better mechanism to handle them except foster homes which historically get underfunded (and have a stigma of being bad environments to grow up).
These are problems that need to be saved for another day, though. But my point is, we need to improve the way impoverished children are handled in our society so we can worsen (by taking away their children) the way impoverished adults are handled. This worsening will generate a thrust of motivation that will help the overall country improve its overall health due to the inversely proportional relationship that I mentioned earlier.
(Footnote: I'm not actively suggesting that we go take children away from people, only that we consider the option so that people who are in the position to bring new children into the world are aware of the risk that they could lose their currently unborn children in the future if they don't stay motivated to find ways to contribute to society.)


